Frequently we do not own a repository, yet we want to work with the code in the repository. We could clone the repository, but then when it is updated, the only way to get the changes is to risk over writing or losing our own changes. We could make a separate copy of the repository, but then we would never be able to get updates. There is, however, a third solution: fork the repository. Now you own a copy of the repository. You can update it all you want. At the same time, there is still a link (upstream) back to the original repository. You can make your changes, and still merge in any changes from the original. You can't contribute to the original, but you merge in changes from the original. If you ever wanted to merge your changes to the original repository, then there is a way to do that. In other words, this is how many open source projects accept changes. You fork their project, develop new code, then tell the owners of the original repository to look at your fork, and if they like it they can accept the changes.
Upstream Repo ---> My Fork \ < \ / \ / > My Local Copy
In the diagram above, the UpStream Repo is the Original Project that we want to fork. When we fork the repository, then we end up with a copy of the repository on GitHub. That is what I label as My Fork. We can then make a local copy of My Fork.
The path between My Fork and My Local Fork is two way: we can pull and push. The path between UpStream and My Local Copy is one way: you can only pull. That is, you can only pull unless the Upstream repo decides to accept your commits, which is a special case.
Most of the time, we don't want to merge our commits with the original repo, we just want to modify our version of the project without losing the link to the original. So we are usually only concerned with pulling from the UpStream Repo. Therefore, I do not show on this diagram that it is possible to get our changes back into the upstream repository. That is a special case, and not shown in this diagram.
The commands you give are as follows, though you only give the first command once, the first time you try to update your local copy from the upstream remote.
git remote add upstream [GIT URL OF SOURCE REPO] git fetch upstream git rebase upstream/master
For instance, if you are trying to get updates from Angular-Seed, the first command would look like this:
git remote add upstream https://github.com/angular/angular-seed.git
And a first session might look like this:
>git remote add upstream https://github.com/angular/angular-seed.git >git fetch upstream From https://github.com/angular/angular-seed * [new branch] master -> upstream/master * [new branch] v0.10.x -> upstream/v0.10.x >git rebase upstream/master Current branch master is up to date.
After you added the remote, you can skip that step, so the session might look more like this:
>git fetch upstream >git rebase upstream/master Current branch master is up to date.
Exactly what you see will depend on what changes have occurred to upstream remote repository. In the examples I have shown, the upstream repository and the local repository were identical, so the output is not very interesting, but hopefully it helps you see what you need to do.
VonC has a number of good explanations on StackOverflow:
Stackoverflow: How to update git forked repository
git fetch upstream git checkout -f -B master upstream/master
Copyright © 2017 by Charles Calvert